Arias death penalty
Arias death penalty, PHOENIX -- Jodi Arias spent 18 days on the stand sharing intimate,
emotional and oftentimes X-rated details of her life before a rapt
television and online audience. She had hoped that it all might convince
a jury that she killed her one-time boyfriend in self-defense.
But the eight men and four women on the panel didn't buy it, convicting Ms. Arias of first-degree murder after only about 15 hours of deliberations. Jurors will return to court today to begin the next phase of the trial that could set the stage for her receiving a death sentence.
It is a punishment that Ms. Arias herself says she wants, telling a TV station minutes after her conviction that she would "prefer to die sooner than later." A tearful Ms. Arias told Fox affiliate KSAZ: "Longevity runs in my family, and I don't want to spend the rest of my natural life in one place. I believe death is the ultimate freedom, and I'd rather have my freedom as soon as I can get it."
The case elevated the unknown waitress and aspiring photographer to a household name, with a
real-life story of love, betrayal and murder far more alluring than any made-for-TV movie. The crime itself was enough to grab headlines: Ms. Arias, a 32-year-old high school dropout, shot Travis Alexander in the forehead, stabbed him nearly 30 times and slit his throat from ear to ear, leaving the motivational speaker and businessman nearly decapitated.
She claimed that he had attacked her, and that she had fought for her life. Prosecutors said she killed out of jealous rage after Alexander wanted to end their affair and planned to take a trip to Mexico with another woman.
Ms. Arias' four-month trial quickly became a media sensation -- ratings gold for cable networks that could broadcast from inside the courtroom and feed an insatiable public appetite for true-crime drama, delivered live and up-close. It was, for many, the horrible train wreck they just couldn't turn away from, even though they know they should.
Ms. Arias fought back tears as the verdict was announced Wednesday in the hushed, packed courtroom, while Alexander's family members wept and hugged each other. They wore blue ribbons and wristbands with the words "Justice For Travis." The family thanked prosecutor Juan Martinez and a key witness, and said it appreciated the outpouring of support from the public.
Outside, a huge crowd that had gathered on the courthouse steps screamed, whistled and cheered the news in a case that has attracted fans from across the country who traveled to Phoenix to be close to the proceedings.
Alexander's friend Chris Hughes said he was happy with the verdict, pointing out a bold proclamation that Ms. Arias had made in one of her jailhouse interviews that she wouldn't be found guilty. "She said, 'No jury would convict me. Mark my words.' This jury convicted her," Mr. Hughes said. "Luckily, we had 12 smart jurors. They nailed it."
When asked about Alexander's family, Ms. Arias told the station, "I just hope that now that a verdict has been rendered, that they'll be able to find peace."
The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office said no more media interviews with Ms. Arias would be granted. She has been placed on suicide watch.
Testimony began in early January, and the trial quickly snowballed into a made-for-the-tabloids drama, garnering daily coverage from cable news networks and spawning a virtual cottage industry for talk shows, legal experts and even Ms. Arias, who used her notoriety to sell artwork she made in jail.
The trial now moves into the so-called aggravation phase, during which prosecutors will argue that the killing was committed in an especially cruel, heinous and depraved manner that should allow jurors to consider the death penalty. Both sides may call witnesses and show evidence. If the panel finds the aggravating factors exist, the trial then moves into the final penalty phase, during which jurors will recommend either life in prison or death.
Authorities said Alexander fought for his life as Ms. Arias attacked him in a blitz, but he soon grew too weak to defend himself. "Mr. Alexander did not die calmly," Mr. Martinez told jurors in opening statements.
Ms. Arias said she recalled Alexander attacking her in a fury after a day of sex. She said he came at her "like a linebacker," body-slamming her to the tile floor. She managed to wriggle free and ran into his closet to retrieve a gun he kept on a shelf. She said she fired in self-defense, but had no memory of stabbing him.
She acknowledged trying to clean up the killing scene, dumping the gun in the desert and working on an alibi to avoid suspicion. She said she was too scared and ashamed to tell the truth.
But none of Ms. Arias' allegations -- that Alexander had physically abused her in months before his death, that he owned a gun and had sexual desires for young boys -- were corroborated by witnesses or evidence during the trial. She acknowledged lying repeatedly before and after her arrest, but insisted that she was telling the truth in court.
Ms. Arias spent 18 days on the witness stand describing an abusive childhood, cheating boyfriends, dead-end jobs, a shocking sexual relationship with Alexander, and her contention that he had grown physically violent.
A defense expert later testified that Ms. Arias suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative amnesia, which explained why she couldn't recall much from the day of the killing. Another defense witness concluded that Ms. Arias was a battered woman.
Mr. Martinez worked feverishly to attack the credibility of the defense experts, accusing them of having sympathy for her and offering biased opinions.
Aside from her lies, Ms. Arias had another formidable obstacle to overcome. Her grandparents had reported a .25-caliber handgun stolen from their Northern California home about a week before Alexander's death -- the same caliber used to shoot him -- but she insisted that she didn't take it. Authorities believe that she brought it with her to kill him. The coincidence of the same caliber gun stolen from the home also being used to shoot Alexander was never resolved.
But the eight men and four women on the panel didn't buy it, convicting Ms. Arias of first-degree murder after only about 15 hours of deliberations. Jurors will return to court today to begin the next phase of the trial that could set the stage for her receiving a death sentence.
It is a punishment that Ms. Arias herself says she wants, telling a TV station minutes after her conviction that she would "prefer to die sooner than later." A tearful Ms. Arias told Fox affiliate KSAZ: "Longevity runs in my family, and I don't want to spend the rest of my natural life in one place. I believe death is the ultimate freedom, and I'd rather have my freedom as soon as I can get it."
The case elevated the unknown waitress and aspiring photographer to a household name, with a
real-life story of love, betrayal and murder far more alluring than any made-for-TV movie. The crime itself was enough to grab headlines: Ms. Arias, a 32-year-old high school dropout, shot Travis Alexander in the forehead, stabbed him nearly 30 times and slit his throat from ear to ear, leaving the motivational speaker and businessman nearly decapitated.
She claimed that he had attacked her, and that she had fought for her life. Prosecutors said she killed out of jealous rage after Alexander wanted to end their affair and planned to take a trip to Mexico with another woman.
Ms. Arias' four-month trial quickly became a media sensation -- ratings gold for cable networks that could broadcast from inside the courtroom and feed an insatiable public appetite for true-crime drama, delivered live and up-close. It was, for many, the horrible train wreck they just couldn't turn away from, even though they know they should.
Ms. Arias fought back tears as the verdict was announced Wednesday in the hushed, packed courtroom, while Alexander's family members wept and hugged each other. They wore blue ribbons and wristbands with the words "Justice For Travis." The family thanked prosecutor Juan Martinez and a key witness, and said it appreciated the outpouring of support from the public.
Outside, a huge crowd that had gathered on the courthouse steps screamed, whistled and cheered the news in a case that has attracted fans from across the country who traveled to Phoenix to be close to the proceedings.
Alexander's friend Chris Hughes said he was happy with the verdict, pointing out a bold proclamation that Ms. Arias had made in one of her jailhouse interviews that she wouldn't be found guilty. "She said, 'No jury would convict me. Mark my words.' This jury convicted her," Mr. Hughes said. "Luckily, we had 12 smart jurors. They nailed it."
When asked about Alexander's family, Ms. Arias told the station, "I just hope that now that a verdict has been rendered, that they'll be able to find peace."
The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office said no more media interviews with Ms. Arias would be granted. She has been placed on suicide watch.
Testimony began in early January, and the trial quickly snowballed into a made-for-the-tabloids drama, garnering daily coverage from cable news networks and spawning a virtual cottage industry for talk shows, legal experts and even Ms. Arias, who used her notoriety to sell artwork she made in jail.
The trial now moves into the so-called aggravation phase, during which prosecutors will argue that the killing was committed in an especially cruel, heinous and depraved manner that should allow jurors to consider the death penalty. Both sides may call witnesses and show evidence. If the panel finds the aggravating factors exist, the trial then moves into the final penalty phase, during which jurors will recommend either life in prison or death.
Authorities said Alexander fought for his life as Ms. Arias attacked him in a blitz, but he soon grew too weak to defend himself. "Mr. Alexander did not die calmly," Mr. Martinez told jurors in opening statements.
Ms. Arias said she recalled Alexander attacking her in a fury after a day of sex. She said he came at her "like a linebacker," body-slamming her to the tile floor. She managed to wriggle free and ran into his closet to retrieve a gun he kept on a shelf. She said she fired in self-defense, but had no memory of stabbing him.
She acknowledged trying to clean up the killing scene, dumping the gun in the desert and working on an alibi to avoid suspicion. She said she was too scared and ashamed to tell the truth.
But none of Ms. Arias' allegations -- that Alexander had physically abused her in months before his death, that he owned a gun and had sexual desires for young boys -- were corroborated by witnesses or evidence during the trial. She acknowledged lying repeatedly before and after her arrest, but insisted that she was telling the truth in court.
Ms. Arias spent 18 days on the witness stand describing an abusive childhood, cheating boyfriends, dead-end jobs, a shocking sexual relationship with Alexander, and her contention that he had grown physically violent.
A defense expert later testified that Ms. Arias suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative amnesia, which explained why she couldn't recall much from the day of the killing. Another defense witness concluded that Ms. Arias was a battered woman.
Mr. Martinez worked feverishly to attack the credibility of the defense experts, accusing them of having sympathy for her and offering biased opinions.
Aside from her lies, Ms. Arias had another formidable obstacle to overcome. Her grandparents had reported a .25-caliber handgun stolen from their Northern California home about a week before Alexander's death -- the same caliber used to shoot him -- but she insisted that she didn't take it. Authorities believe that she brought it with her to kill him. The coincidence of the same caliber gun stolen from the home also being used to shoot Alexander was never resolved.
posted by Unknown @ 14:20
<< Home